IT’S “extremely unlikely” Slough Council will claw back the costs to make safe a building covered in Grenfell Tower-esque cladding from insurers, it has been claimed.
Back in 2019, the cabinet approved to make a £7m loan, with an option to provide an additional £3m, to Ground Rental Estates 5 (GRE5) Limited, to remove the dangerous cladding from Nova House in Buckingham Gardens.
GRE5 owns the freehold of the former seven-storey office building, which was converted into 68 flats in 2015.
But after the cladding failed two flammability tests with “significant defects” found in the compartmentation, Slough Borough Council (SBC) bought shares from GRE5 as well as appointing directors to the company board in 2017 to fix the problems themselves.
At a full council meeting on Thursday, July 22, councillors had to re-approve their £10m loan to the company after it was unearthed the 2019 loan was “inappropriately authorised” as cabinet did not have the powers to approve this loan.
READ MORE: Slough Council fears boundary changes will "damage" town's integrity
All loans require full council approval.
Speaking at the meeting, the borough’s new chief financial officer, Steven Mair, said the financial risks were not “fully explained” to cabinet members at the time and it is “extremely unlikely” the costs will be fully recovered from the insurers.
It has been reported the costs to do the work have spiralled to £18.8 million. But Mr Mair warned costs could “escalate further”.
The situation has been made more complicated after Slough Borough Council issued a section 114 notice and froze all non-essential spending due to its fragile finances.
But councillor Dexter Smith (Con: Colnbrook with Poyle) said the council should seek the developer of Nova House, Timeless property services limited, to gain back compensation for the council and leaseholders.
He said: “It seems SBC has misunderstood what it means to be responsible for local enforcement on these post-Grenfell cladding issues under the housing act. That is our legal responsibility.
“We are supposed to go after the owner/developer that put the cladding on the building and their insurer and not let them off the hook.”
READ MORE: Slough Council will sell more properties to plug financial hole
In the recommendations, SBC agreed to provide a parent company to Slough Urban Renewal, which is working with GRE5 to carry out the work, to oversee development costs for the replacement of the cladding that is not funded by Homes England.
GRE5 was granted a further £7.8m from the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government/Homes England to help with the work.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here